Search

What is delayed cord clamping?

(2 ratings)
Delayed cord clamping
Delayed umbilical cord clamping has gathered popularity in recent years, with many believing it helps babies receive increased essential nutrients in the first few moments of their lives.

When it comes to the type of birth you're considering, there are many things to think about. But would you be tempted to think about delayed cord clamping? We take a look at what it's all about.

What is delayed clamping?

The practice sees doctors and midwives wait for at least a couple of minutes before clamping and removing the baby's cord, which is attached to the mother's placenta. Traditionally this has been done almost instantly because doctors believed it lowered the risk of mothers potentially haemorrhaging after giving birth. However, according to a study by Cochrane Library of medical researchers the risk remains the same for immediate and delayed clamping.

Why is delayed clamping considered beneficial?

Research has shown that holding off from removing the cord for at least two minutes (or until the cord has stopped pulsating) could potentially boost new-borns' iron levels.

The Royal College of Midwives published research in a 2015 report that says, 'Immediate cord clamping reduces the flow of blood to the baby and can deprive the baby of iron. Iron deficiency in the first few months is associated with neurodevelopmental delay.

In healthy [full] term babies the evidence supports deferred clamping as this appears to improve iron stores in infancy. This is in line with NICE guidance. Once delivered, the baby can be placed on the mother's abdomen or chest with the cord intact and the timing of clamping should be recorded.'

Speaking to the Guardian, Belinda Phipps, chief executive of the NCT, explained that she thought widely practiced delayed clamping could reduce the number of new-borns who need specialist care after delivery. 'When a baby is born around a third of the baby's blood is still in their cord and placenta, and clamping the cord early reduces the iron available to the baby. It is becoming increasingly clear that things need to change', she said.

What are the potential negatives to delayed clamping?

In some cases, however, delayed clamping wouldn't be advised, and should be judged by clinical assessment for each case. For instance, if a baby needs immediate resuscitation, or the mother is losing a lot of blood it may be necessary to remove the cord immediately. There is also some research to say that delayed clamping slightly increases the chance of jaundice in new-borns.

Continued below...


Would you consider delaying the clamping of your baby's umbilical cord? Let us know in the comments below.

Your rating

Average rating

  • 5
(2 ratings)

Your comments

dianne garland

Firstly whilst I totally agree with what is written I also believe we need to ensure we call it optimal cord clamping not delayed - we have introduced the process and wording of delayed - which is a negative impact in newborn briefly explained in the interview but also implies to parents that we have "delayed" doing something. Optimal is a far better description of when to clamp and cut the cord if at all - many midwives practice not only optimal cord clamping but also delivery of the placenta attached to the baby. Some mothers ask for lotus birth - a whole new story - please do not under value the placenta its vital to the baby's wellbeing.

comments powered by Disqus

FREE Newsletter